From inside the mention of this remark out of a lot more than: “Monogamist people help the individuals really worth exaltation throughout the design but they will not reign because Gods. Here is the doctrine found in the LDS scriptures today and followed by Fundamentalist LDS.
When you look at the mention of the which comment away from over: “132 also enables polyandry of these women who should get married a man holding a top priesthood.”
It doesn’t seem like the conventional MO, should not it discover: 132 lets men that have a higher priesthood so you’re able to marry another people’s girlfriend if he decides. ?
A beneficial Aura. Polygamy in paradise isn’t necessarily on which someone desires. Their concerning the undeniable fact that its one possible chance for how it could turn out if people wants they or otherwise not. We for one don’t want to end anything if there is zero cause for and also make a conclusion. We stop that we can do exactly what I’m questioned, any sort of that is.
And lots of folks do think one to the philosophy is a factor for making a reason on which you may anticipate in the next existence.
Well, possibly the journalist jesus doesn’t want polygamy inside eden for all I understand. Why would he indeed? Didn’t I simply point out that neither We nor not one person more keeps the solution? Then exactly why are you actually inquiring?
An excellent State of mind said: “FYI – Warren Jeff’s, the newest fundamentalist child, was incarcerated without longer good “prophet” of the their own admission.”
The brand new philosophy and instruction towards the plural wedding failed to come from Warren Jeff’s, they came from Joseph Smith and so are found in all of our Doctrine and you can Covenants. The part try unimportant. Very polygamists inside country don’t pursue Warren Jeff’s and you will believe by themselves “independents” that take a look at our very own chapel participants as the “offer outs”. Independent fundamentalists alot more vigilantly proceed with the lessons and you will doctrine educated by the Joseph Smith and other LDS prophets.
If the our very own chapel no further believes inside plural relationships due to the fact a good need for exaltation after that why don’t LDS management take it off regarding all of our scriptures? Why do they consistently routine “spiritual plural relationship” about temples for males who remarry?
“In the event the our very own chapel not believes when you look at the plural marriage once the good need for exaltation then how about we LDS management eliminate it out-of our scriptures? Exactly why do it continue steadily to practice “spiritual plural matrimony” from the temples for men whom remarry?”
For everyone we realize, this is only holdover or vestige from the plural marriage stuff have not faded out yet entirely, and maybe in the future the newest Chapel takes measures to totally renounce it. Or perhaps the an indicator the Chapel really never performed change its center philosophy, and that it perform restore plural relationships when your most recent order of anything was in fact shaken up and folded. That is why. Just what a does it to inquire of such inquiries, otherwise reach conclusions of any sort once they just wade unanswered? And all you get was a lot of people with opinions?
Responding so you’re able to: The fresh philosophy and lessons with the plural elizabeth out-of Joseph Smith and you can are within the Doctrine and Covenants. Your own part was irrelevant.
Not exactly, the main point is that folks exactly who go after JS’s polygamy philosophy avoid up incarcerated (next and then). Jeffs simply grabbed it to a different height because of the seeking validate this new doctrine now along with his allege given that a good prophet.
In response to: If the our very own chapel not any longer thinks in the plural marriage just like the an effective significance of exaltation following let’s LDS leadership take it off off all of our scriptures?